top of page

Culture & History II

Project 1 : Timeline and Diagram Analysis (Integration with Studio 2)

​

From the brief : " The greatest architectural transformation followed Merdeka, or Independence in 1957. Kuala Lumpur and other parts of Malaysia was transformed from colonial towns into parts of the new nation and Kuala Lumpur became its capital. Proud symbols of nationhood were expressed in new and daring forms. Innovative construction techniques and industrialized components changed the scale of commercial buildings and enabled the erection of the first prominent buildings and sky scrapers that shaped the nations modern architectural scene. According to Ar. Chan Seong Aun, president of Pertubuhan Akitek Malaysia (2013-2015), most Malaysian architecture of the modern movement are not documented thoroughly and have not made the list of heritage buildings. The Subang airport for example has been replaced by a “non descript warehouse. It is therefore important that we properly record the heritage of Malaysian architecture before it is destroyed and lost forever.This research project adopts document analysis methodology that involves documenting, analyzing, producing, and a critical chronological and diagrammatic interpretation of Modern Malaysian architectural history. This project emphasizes critical analysis of the post Merdeka/Independence of Malaysian architecture in the effort to understand the influences of post-modernism to architectural design and construction, building science and technology, and urban design. The project is to distinguish the way in which many diverse factors contribute to the development of Modern Malaysian architecture. The development of the project will involve active discussion, analysis interpretation and consultation with the tutor."

​

Task and Submission :

In a team of 12, we were to make a Modern Malaysia Architectural Chronology of Petaling Jaya.

 

The first outcome of the project will be an A3 sized illustrative chronology poster of Modern Malaysian Architecture (hardcopy) (20%) that interprets the Modern Malaysian Architectural language and architecture influences to the architectural development of Malaysia in particular.

Submission format for the project is a continuous Timeline Analysis Poster of A3 width, with updated data and visual of chosen topic. APA Referencing and sourcing is a must.

​

​

​

Project 2 : Report (Group & Individual)

​

From project brief : " The Klang Valley is a rich source of architectural heritage dating from pre-colonial, colonial, post independence until present times. The historical richness creates a very vibrant architectural fabric. Modern architecture emerged rapidly fromthe1950’s to 1970’s in tandem with economic growth. This followed the international style that spread across the world in the 1930’s to 50’s. However, many historical modernistic buildings may face risk of being demolished to make way for more contemporary buildings. Thus, by recording, documenting and analysing the buildings, we can contribute to preserve the historical evidence of the valuable Modern Architecture in the Klang Valley. The findings are to be compiled in essays and to be submitted using a web book platform. Web book is a publication in digital form, consisting of text(report), images, or both."

 

We chose Wisma Angkasapuri for our report. The report requirements are as follows :

A report should be written documenting the findings of the analysis. You may support the information using photos, sketches and diagrams as evidence. Cite your references. Avoid plagiarism. The report can be divided into:

​

1. Introduction (Group Components)

a) Introduction

- Fast facts of the building

- Building name, location, function etc (may provide map & photos)

- History of the building ( cite your reference )

- The Architect

 

b) Main Paragraph (Individual Components) consisting of Architectural style and construction analysis of the building

 

- Site context analysis

Building accessibility

Relationship of building to surroundings.(Compare the similarities or differences)

Response to climate.

 

- Architectural layout of building

Plan to section or elevation analysis,

Circulation to use

Space organization analysis: symmetry and balance, geometry, hierarchy.

 

- Architecture style analysis

Explain the specific style adopted and the characteristics of the style. Is it a pure modern building as in the west or are there local influence? Identify and explain further if it has local influence.

 

- Building construction, structure & materials analysis

Explain specific materials and construction method used to construct the building. Compare the similarities or differences with other modern buildings in the west.

 

- Architectural elements / components analysis

Identify and explain the significant

components such as roof, windows, doors, fenestrations, shading, staircase or other significant elements that can be found in the chosen building. Each building may have different components. Analyse the significant components and use photos or sketches as evidence.

 

2. Conclusion (Group Components)

Students are expected to distribute the main paragraph accordingly and equally among all members. This is to ensure each student have similar emphasis for individual assessment. Students are also advised to check the flow of the essay together even though they are individually written.

​

Finally, the outcome!

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

bottom of page